November 15th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in presenting numbers, adverts, statistics, bad science | 24 Comments »
We’re all suckers for a big number, and you’ll be delighted to hear that the Journal of Consumer Research has huge teams of scientists all eagerly writing up their sinister research on how to exploit us.
One excellent study this month looked at how people choose a digital camera. This will become relevant in three paragraphs’ time. The researchers took a single image, then processed it in Photoshop to make two copies: one where the colours were more vivid, and one where the image was sharper. They told participants that each image came from a different camera, and asked which they wanted to buy. About a quarter chose the one with the more colourful sharper image. Read the rest of this entry »
November 10th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in podcast, not bad science, onanism | 44 Comments »
So I’ve got a documentary on Radio 4 at 8pm this evening on incapacity benefit, and it’s a bit of a veer from the norm, because it’s a subject where I’m not entirely sure what I think.
Here’s why I care. I once sat drinking with a group of medics, arguing over what would be the single contemporary medical activity that future generations would look back on with horror, and think, “what, on earth, were you playing at?” Would it be another thalidomide, or perhaps a social issue that doctors blindly and obediently waded in on, like when we unhelpfully tried to electrocute gay people straight. The answer we came up with was “nurse-led prescribing”. Read the rest of this entry »
November 8th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in regulating media, regulating nonsense | 35 Comments »
* Ben Goldacre
* The Guardian, Saturday November 8 2008
Last week I failed to distinguish satisfactorily between the fantastical miasmatic theory of disease in the middle ages and the fantastical miasmatic theory of disease as meant by some homeopaths. This made no difference to my argument - that the science of a disease is more interesting than made up nonsense about it - but it was an error, it was mine, and there is no ignominy in clarifying that.
So you’re reading Woman’s Own, and you get to the “Real life - health” pages, and you see “Most people jump when the phone rings unexpectedly, but for Jackie Dewhurst, 39, it could be deadly”. Read the rest of this entry »
November 1st, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in mondo academico, homeopathy, nutritionists, alternative medicine, PhDs, doctors, and qualifications | 72 Comments »
Ben Goldacre
The Guardian
Saturday 1st November 2008
Guy Ritchie has cancelled Madonna’s order for tens of thousands of pounds worth of special Kabbalah water to fill their swimming pool. It’s always uncomfortable when we have to humour someone close to us in the name of avoiding conflict. Right now in Thames Valley University, for example, entire science departments must be feeling slightly embarrassed about their degrees in quackery. Because despite the refusal of all universities to openly disclose what they teach on these – uniquely their ideas must be shielded from critical appraisal - the leaks keep coming, and Professor David Colquhoun of UCL continues to archive the comedy on his website.
Read the rest of this entry »
October 26th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in badscience, regulating research | 16 Comments »
Ben Goldacre
The Guardian,
Saturday October 25 2008
Welcome to nerds’ corner, and yet another small print criticism of a trivial act of borderline dubiousness which will ultimately lead to distorted evidence, irrational decisions, and bad outcomes in what I like to call “the real world”.
So the ClinPsyc blog (clinpsyc.blogspot.com ) has spotted that the drug company Lilly have published identical data on duloxetine - a new-ish antidepressant drug – twice over, in two entirely separate scientific papers. Read the rest of this entry »
October 15th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in onanism | 20 Comments »
I’ve got a couple of talks coming up in the next while, and I’m posting them here for people who don’t read the miniblog on the right hand side of the page (it’s the best thing about this site, much better than my rambling blog posts) and aren’t members of the miraculous facebook group which Shalinee Singh very kindly helps to update. Read the rest of this entry »
October 8th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in teaching resources | 34 Comments »
A couple of years ago I made a bunch of school resources for teachers with the organisation NESTA and a group of teachers. Since I mentioned them in the book a couple of people have asked for them, so here they are: Read the rest of this entry »
October 7th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in book reviews, book, onanism | 25 Comments »
Reproduced cheekily below. He’s Arthur Smith’s brother, don’t you know. Read the rest of this entry »
October 4th, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in publication bias, mondo academico, regulating research, MMR, bad science | 19 Comments »
Ben Goldacre
The Guardian
Saturday October 4 2008
Important and timely news from the Journal of Medical Hypotheses this week: ejaculating could be “a potential treatment of nasal congestion in mature males.” My reason for bothering you with this will become clear later. Read the rest of this entry »
October 2nd, 2008 by Ben Goldacre in book reviews, book, onanism, telegraph, bad science | 10 Comments »
There’s a very nice review of my book “Bad Science” in the Telegraph this week. I have to say I’m delighted to see that the two newspapers I’ve probably been meanest about over recent years are the two that have reviewed it so far. This betrays a genuinely wholesome grown up approach to life which properly warms the cockles of my heart.
Read the rest of this entry »